A California jury has awarded more than $15 million to a Black city employee who said she endured years of racial discrimination, including being called an “entitled N-word” by her supervisor.
The unanimous verdict found the City of Fresno liable for creating a hostile work environment and retaliating against employee La-Kebbia Wilson, who worked in the city’s code enforcement department.
Wilson was awarded $15 million, while her co-plaintiff Charles Smith received $400,000 after supporting her claims and testifying during the trial.
Allegations of Workplace Racism
According to court testimony, Wilson accused her supervisor, Howard Lacy, of repeatedly using racist and degrading language toward her, including calling her “lazy” and a “piece of sh*t,” while also alleging she used her race for personal advantage.
Smith testified that he personally heard Lacy use the racial slur and other disparaging remarks, describing internal conflict over reporting the behavior due to his relationship with the supervisor.
Lacy denied making the statements, and a city-led internal investigation concluded there was no evidence he used such language.
Jury Sides with Plaintiffs
After a 10-day trial, the eight-member jury deliberated for just one day before siding with Wilson and Smith, concluding they were victims of racism and retaliation.
Wilson, who became emotional as the verdict was read, said the outcome was about accountability rather than financial gain.
“I prayed… let the city be exposed for who they are,” she said outside the courthouse.
Her attorney argued that the city failed to take her complaints seriously, pointing to what he described as inconsistent disciplinary actions. Wilson was penalized for using profanity during a workplace incident, while Lacy faced no consequences following the allegations.
City Response and Possible Appeal
Officials in Fresno have indicated the city may appeal the verdict, citing the potential financial impact of the payout.
City representatives emphasized that the events occurred under a previous administration, while also noting that the judgment—if upheld—could force difficult budgetary decisions affecting public services.
Broader Implications
The case highlights ongoing concerns about workplace discrimination and the handling of internal complaints within public institutions. It also underscores the legal risks municipalities face when allegations of racial harassment are not adequately addressed.
Legal experts note that large jury awards in discrimination cases often reflect not only the severity of the conduct alleged but also the perceived failure of employers to investigate and respond appropriately.
