A woman on Instagram has revealed the presence of an online platform, Project 2025 Observer, that tracks the progress the controversial blueprint that many say is guiding President Donald Trump’s administration.
Pamela Smith (@blackhomeeducators) took to Instagram to explain how the site is tracking in real time how many of The Project 2025 goals have already been implemented.
The website appears to offer public transparency into an ambitious agenda to reshape federal governance, promote loyalist hiring, reduce environmental regulations, and centralize executive power under the Trump administration.
What Is Being Tracked
The website builds on a grassroots spreadsheet started by Reddit users, who transformed their research into a functional, searchable, and interactive tracker.
Users can see live data, including a progress bar showing 313 total objectives—100 marked as “done” and 65 “in progress,” equating to roughly 40% completion.
It also includes agency-specific breakdowns and a countdown clock showing how much time remains in the current term.
Why It Matters
Project 2025 is more than a campaign slogan—it’s a sweeping conservative playbook authored by The Heritage Foundation and allies, advocating sweeping reforms: partisan control of the DOJ and FBI, cuts to Medicare and Medicaid, climate deregulation, restrictions on federal diversity initiatives, and more.
Its critics warn it risks undermining civil liberties, judicial checks, and the very separation of powers foundational to American democracy.
Therefore, the Project 2025 Observer fills an important gap: while executive orders that align with this agenda are being issued steadily, detailed tracking has been fragmented.
Now, readers and researchers can easily verify whether specific policy moves correspond to the blueprint.
Built for Public Accountability
Described as a “community-driven resource powered by people who believe in the importance of transparent, detailed analysis,” the website operates independently—with no funding from advocacy groups or governments.
It’s rated highly credible by Media Bias/Fact Check, with an editorial lean toward left-center political perspectives.
