Influencer Exposes How Flo Period Tracker And Tech Giants Profited From Women’s Private Health Data

by Gee NY

When health apps promise empowerment but deliver exploitation, the betrayal cuts deep. That’s the powerful message behind a viral post from wellness influencer @QueenOfVitality.

The Influencer has broken down one of the most significant privacy scandals in recent tech history — the Flo Health data-sharing lawsuit — with refreshing candor and righteous anger.

Her post, which has sparked heated debate online, revisits how Flo Health, a period and fertility tracking app used by over 50 million women worldwide, was caught secretly sharing users’ menstrual, pregnancy, and sexual health data with third-party tech companies like Google, Flurry, and Meta (Facebook) — all without user consent.

“The man-owned female-focused app was caught secretly sharing users’ private data… and they PAID OUT,” @QueenOfVitality wrote in her caption. “If you used Flo back then, your data may have been affected.”

A Breach of Trust

Between November 2016 and February 2019, Flo quietly transmitted deeply personal reproductive data — from cycle lengths to pregnancy notes — to tech giants that used it for targeted advertising and analytics.

Flo Health, owned by Russian developer Dmitry Gurski, marketed itself as a secure, women-centered app where users could “confidently track their bodies.” Instead, it became a case study in digital betrayal — a reminder that when health data becomes a product, women’s privacy is often the price.

Meta employees were even making jokes and laughing about having access to women’s menstrual information, saying things like, ‘May the Flow be with you,’@QueenOfVitality said in her video, citing a message from one of the women who helped fight the case in court.

The case, filed in California under privacy statutes like the California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA) and the California Confidentiality of Medical Information Act (CMIA), revealed a complex network of data transfers involving multiple tech players.

According to court filings and settlement announcements:

  • Google agreed to pay $48 million, settling before trial.
  • Flurry, an analytics firm, settled earlier this year for $3.5 million.
  • Flo Health paid $8 million, finalizing its portion of the class action this fall.
  • Meta, however, faces the steepest potential penalty — up to $8 billion — after losing an appeal over charges that it intercepted and profited from private reproductive health data.

Under U.S. federal privacy and medical data laws, penalties for such violations can reach $5,000 per person under the Privacy Act and $1,000 per person under medical privacy statutes. With roughly 1.6 million affected users, the financial implications are staggering.

A Wake-Up Call for Women’s Digital Privacy

For @QueenOfVitality, the Flo lawsuit isn’t just about corporate negligence — it’s about how women’s bodies have become data points in the digital economy.

“They turned our cycles into currency,” she said.This case shows that women’s health data has been weaponized for profit — and that has to stop.

Her post echoes growing concerns among privacy advocates that reproductive health data — especially in a post-Roe v. Wade America — could be misused, whether for advertising, surveillance, or even law enforcement.

The issue has global implications. Flo faces parallel lawsuits in Europe and Canada, where stricter privacy laws like the GDPR could lead to additional financial and reputational fallout.

“I saw that their stuff was really weird and switched to clue. Never knew there was a lawsuit. Where do I sign up to get my $5k?” someone commented.

Intelligent Insight: The Bigger Picture

This scandal sits at the crossroads of data ethics, gender justice, and digital capitalism. What makes it particularly egregious isn’t just the technical breach — it’s the moral breach.

As privacy experts have noted, health apps often exploit the illusion of intimacy. They encourage users — mostly women — to document their emotions, sexual habits, and fertility patterns under the promise of empowerment. But behind that promise lies a system built to monetize vulnerability.

“Women’s health apps are supposed to give control,” one data protection lawyer explained. “Instead, they’re revealing just how little control women have once their data enters the digital marketplace.”

The settlements, though significant, may only scratch the surface of a much larger problem: the unregulated trade in intimate data.

A Call for Accountability

For now, @QueenOfVitality’s message serves as both a warning and a rallying cry. Her advocacy has resonated with thousands of followers who are demanding stronger legal safeguards and transparency from health tech companies.

If you used Flo back then, your data is part of this. Keep an eye out for updates, she urged.This case proves that women can fight back — and win.

The Flo scandal may have started as a lawsuit, but it’s ending as something more — a reckoning. A reminder that the real cost of “free” apps is often paid not in dollars, but in trust.

Related Posts

Crown App

FREE
VIEW