Roc Nation artist Victory Boyd has filed a copyright infringement lawsuit against music heavyweights Travis Scott, SZA, and Future, alleging that their song “Telekinesis” from Scott’s 2023 album Utopia unlawfully incorporates elements of her original work.
Boyd, a singer-songwriter known for her introspective lyrics and soulful sound, took to social media to share her story, framing the lawsuit as both a legal battle and a spiritual mission.
Allegations of Stolen Work
Boyd’s lawsuit, filed in Manhattan federal court, claims that “Telekinesis” borrows heavily from her 2019 song, “Like the Way It Sounds,” which she developed while working with Kanye West in Wyoming.
According to Boyd, she crafted multiple versions of the track, including one called “Future Bounce,” with the intent of honoring her faith.
Boyd alleges that Travis Scott gained access to her work during recording sessions with West and later used it as the basis for “Telekinesis” without her consent.
She accuses Scott and his collaborators of copying not only the melody but also the lyrics.
Boyd stressed the spiritual origins of her work, stating: “I wrote this song for God… Permission simply would not have been granted.”
Additional Defendants and Claims
The lawsuit also targets Cactus Jack Records, Sony Music, and Swiss luxury watchmaker Audemars Piguet.
Boyd alleges the brand used her song in a commercial campaign with Travis Scott despite her explicit refusal to grant permission. Boyd rejected an offer for an 8% writing credit, asserting that it undervalued her contributions.
In an Instagram video, Boyd recounted her creative journey, expressing her frustration over the unauthorized use of her work. She described her lawsuit as akin to the biblical story of David and Goliath, vowing to fight against what she views as exploitation by powerful entities.
Industry Implications
This case underscores ongoing debates over intellectual property and artistic collaboration in the music industry. Boyd’s claims highlight the blurred lines between inspiration and infringement, particularly in high-profile creative partnerships.
Boyd seeks a jury trial, financial damages, and a court injunction to halt further use of the song. In her social media posts, she invited fans to consider the spiritual dimension of her fight, reiterating her faith-driven purpose: “It’s not about the money… it’s about reclaiming God’s property.”
